Tuesday 23 January 2018

Why cycling 1,200 kms was the best thing I’ve ever done

Alice Gillam by a river

It was, hands down, the best thing I’ve ever done.

Eurovelo 1 in france

Tackling challenges on my trip gave me my self-confidence back

Bike rests against fence by beach

I camped and my bike was loaded with everything I would need (and many things I didn’t)

Before I left for France I cycled frequently but never very far. I was lucky to live just a few miles from work and heading down the 13 mile Bristol and Bath Path once or twice a summer was the furthest I cycled. So when I headed off to ride the length of France I was a little unprepared to say the least.

It was, hands down, the best thing I’ve ever done.

 Riding a bike makes me feel free and confident in a way almost nothing else does.

- Alice Gillam

Remembering it now has me itching to get a map and start marking out potential routes. The trip was totally freeing. I cycled along the French section of Eurovelo 1 (also known as Velodyssey) which is around 1,200 kilometres. The full route goes from Norway to Portugal and includes sections of National Cycle Network in England (the Devon Coast to Coast), Wales (the Celtic Trail) and Scotland (Lochs and Glens).

Getting out of my comfort-zone

While it was an excellent route, well-signed and mostly flat, it was still challenging at times. I camped and my bike was loaded with everything I would need (and many things I didn’t). The beginning of my trip took place in a full on heatwave and when the weather eventually broke it was in spectacular fashion with thunderstorms, torrential rain and wind that brought trees down on some of the paths. In some places the storms brought thorned greenery onto the track and was, I’m fairly certain, the reason I got six punctures in five days.

Not only were the bad times more than made up for by the good times (spotting a deer running through grape vines, smelling fields of wheat baking in the sunshine, gliding through thick pine forests and past Atlantic beaches) they were an important part of the trip in themselves.

As a kid we’re happy to try new things without worrying about being bad at them. Unfortunately once we’re adults it can be easy to lose this confidence. By staying in a comfort zone I’d fallen into the mindset of thinking that I couldn’t do new things. I spent far too long saying no to things, saying ‘I can’t’ or ‘I won’t be good at that’.

Challenges helped build my confidence 

Tackling challenges on my trip gave me my self-confidence back. I travelled alone so map reading, finding campsites, fixing my bike and conversing in a foreign language were all down to me. Doing these things alone reminded me that I can master new skills. I can fix a puncture (with a little difficulty and a lot of swearing). I can put up a tent. I can’t really map read but I can ask for directions in French. And most of all I can propel myself over a thousand kilometers from one end to the other of one of the largest countries in Europe. If that’s possible then what next?

It also reminded me that while being self-reliant is a great skill to have you’re rarely truly alone. Every time I was fixing something on my bike or changing a tyre people would stop and offer to help. They checked that I was okay and that I had all the tools I needed. Strangers happily filled my water bottle when there were no public fountains and went out of their way to show me the best places to camp.

Master of your own destiny 

Riding a bike makes me feel free and confident in a way almost nothing else does. When you hop on a bike you become the master of your own destiny. You get to know a place at the perfect pace and can enjoy the feel of the wind rushing past your face as you glide along.

I’ve always thought that a bike is the best way to travel in the city. You feel like you own a place when you traverse it by bike. You get to know its quiet corners, its backstreets, its shared paths running along old train lines. Zipping through city streets, arriving with a smile on your face. But last summer I discovered that it’s also the perfect way to explore a country, all the way from north to south.

So what’s next? I’ve found it. The route I want to do next starts in Nantes and ends in Romania.That sounds like a long way but after my first bike trip I know I can do it. I feel like I can do anything.

Interested in a long-distance bike trip? Check out the maps and guides in our shop

Want to start cycling but need to get your confidence back? Check out our tips for getting started



from RSSMix.com Mix ID 8239590 https://www.sustrans.org.uk/blog/why-cycling-1200-kms-was-best-thing-i%E2%80%99ve-ever-done
via IFTTT

source https://ukresinboundsurfacing.tumblr.com/post/170050725558

Monday 22 January 2018

Can the Mayor treble London’s protected Cycle Superhighways by 2020?

cyclists on Cycle Superhighway (CS) route in London

Before the 2016 Mayoral election, all the main candidates committed to triple the extent of protected space for cycling, through the cycle superhighways programme. With 27 more months guaranteed in office, what does Sadiq Khan need to do to meet this commitment?

The London Assembly Transport Committee are currently investigating the issue and here’s what we know and what’s needed.

If we take the baseline as those built between 2015 and 2016 and exclude some of the non-segregated superhighways from this figure – including routes 7 and 8 and the ‘strategically’ separated route 1, the baseline figure is 15.5 kilometres. Tripling this, then, equates to completing an extra 31 kilometres of segregated route before 2020. This would take the total length of street in London with a new cycle track to over 45km – or 90kms of cycle protected track each way.

While this might sound like a lot, and it is compared to most UK Cities, an international comparison shows how far behind we are. The Copenhagen City Region has 375 kilometres of cycle track each way, which is almost ten times that of London – serving a quarter of London’s population. But Copenhagen wasn’t transformed overnight, so what can London achieve before 2020?

How quickly can Cycle Superhighways be built? 

Nearly five years ago, then London Mayor Boris Johnson cycled up and down the Embankment for the TV cameras to launch his Vision for Cycling in London. In October that year, the first short but sweet section of segregated route opened in Stratford. A sign of things to come.

Construction of the new or upgraded protected Cycle Superhighways promised in the vision began two years later in February 2015, no longer just blue paint but building on international best practice to provide a safe cycle track. By November that year a new protected cycle track –Cycle Superhighway (CS) 5 – from Oval over Vauxhall Bridge had opened – 2kms added. By April 2016, CS1 from the City to Tottenham and the upgrade of CS2 from Bow to Aldgate were complete – a further 6 kilometres. The following month, large sections of the East-West and North-South Superhighways opened just in time for the Mayoral elections – 7.5kms added.

A transformational 14 months in which London’s substantially segregated superhighway network grew by 15.5 kilometres – building at a rate of one kilometre per month. Cycle on these routes and your chances of being knocked off by a vehicle falls to almost zero – its why we need more if London is to keep moving while bearing down on air pollution and physical inactivity.

Of course, the figures exclude all of the planning time dating from before spring 2013 to launch in spring 2016. But it does show what can be achieved with political determinism, technical expertise and major campaigning efforts that went into the East-West route in particular.

What’s in the pipeline? 

While CS11 has appeared to stalled and the discussion re-emerges about the status of Regent’s Park, there are hints that elsewhere things are beginning get moving. Construction continues on the East-West through Hyde Park and North-South Superhighway to King’s Cross. Ground has broken on Superhighway 11 in Swiss Cottage – albeit doubts remain about the rest of the route – and consultations have been completed on routes 4 and 9 in south east and west London respectively. Out on the Westway, a short 1.5km section between East Acton and White City is reportedly soon to begin. Taken together these would extend the Superhighways a further 20kms. This leaves a further 10km to be developed. 5km of which could be the missing link from Lancaster Gate to White City, or on CS5 from Oval to New Cross, or revitalising CS12 to connect the transformed Archway with the to-be-transformed Highbury Corner, on which construction has just started. Upgrades of routes 7 or 8 are much needed. But at this point it’s probably time to ask the Mayor to come out with his plans. We’re 21 months on from the election with 27 months left to go. 

The Mayor’s increased cycling budget, the adoption of a Healthy Streets Approach and the draft Mayor’s Transport Strategy have set a very welcome new direction for transport investment in London. But it’s time the Mayor, jointly with boroughs, published a cycling plan for the remainder of his term – providing the near-term version of the targets in his draft strategy and further detail on what will be built where by 2020. There are 27 months left to build cycle tracks on 30 kilometres of London’s streets. We are all keen to know if this will happen and where these will be. Time is running short.

Read our written submission to the London Assembly Transport Committee inquiry into Cycling Infrastructure



from RSSMix.com Mix ID 8239590 https://www.sustrans.org.uk/blog/can-mayor-treble-london%E2%80%99s-protected-cycle-superhighways-2020
via IFTTT

source https://ukresinboundsurfacing.tumblr.com/post/170005208093

Thursday 11 January 2018

Joining the dots between Government policies and air quality

cyclists in manchester

How effectively do Government policies take into account the health and environmental impacts of poor air quality? – asks Dr Andy Cope following Sustrans’ pioneering research which estimates the contribution of walking and cycling in reducing air pollution – and the subsequent benefits to public health.

The recent budget included the announcement of a £280 million fund to address air quality in England. Whilst this investment is very welcome, it is very modest. With 29 nine local authorities tasked with coming up with Clean Air Plans, this money won’t go far between them. It also fails to address a lack of joined-up-ness in policy relating to air quality.

Too many policy areas are set up to fail on air quality. For example:

  • Pollution policies are not effectively integrated.
  • Transport policies either disregard air quality implications or are too heavily focussed on distant-future technology-led solutions.
  • Health policies are too heavily focussed on remedial ‘cure’ work, rather than prevention.

Pollution policies are not effectively integrated

The most obvious manifestation of the failure of integrated policy is the separation of nitrogen oxides (NOx) from other air pollution types in recent review exercises and not taking into account particulate matter, PM. The failure to recognise air quality and carbon emissions reduction as being heavily interlinked presents a huge problem. The ‘silo-’ policy responses to these challenges lead to incoherent policy positions and contradictory investment priorities.

The Cost of Energy Review says:

“On other environmental objectives and targets, air quality is directly related to carbon and GHGs. The water pollution from agriculture is caused in part by land use, and the use of energy-intensive fertilisers and other chemicals, and these in turn affect the ability to sequestrate carbon. On transport there are mobility objectives, road-building programmes, airport runways, and highspeed trains, all with impacts on carbon. A key reason why our cities have violated the EU air quality requirement is that the government (and the EU) encouraged a switch from petrol to diesel. This is a way of meeting the climate change objective. But it turns out to be a bad way to meet the air quality objective – another example of non-integrated pollution policies. The absence of an environment protection agency to bring consistency to these diverse environmental challenges is a significant obstacle.” (Source: Cost of Energy Review, Oct 2017, p20).

Forthcoming consultations on a new independent, statutory body on environmental legislation to deliver a ‘Green Brexit’ are very welcome yet their impact won’t go far enough if this body is not given the means to address the challenges of pollution.

Transport policies fail to address air quality today

The fact that we have a major road building programme underway at a time when recognition of the air quality problem is higher than ever is perhaps the worst example of the failure to integrate policies. The air quality and climate change implications of these programmes will be dramatic and negative, but these impacts are barely acknowledged. When rail and airport plans are taken into the mix, the consequences could be catastrophic.

In the context of technology-led solutions to transport policies, too much hope is being placed in unproven technologies. The separation of the consideration of NOx from PMs as described above, for example, means that whilst the advent of a more electrified fleet can be lauded, the fact of the exacerbation of the PM problem that electric cars will lead to due to increased vehicle weights is disregarded. The failure to acknowledge changes in energy demand patterns are a further challenge – the fact of displacement of emissions from power generation from the tail-pipe to the power station may help in local air quality terms, but definitely presents a challenge in terms of greenhouse gas emissions.

Health policies are too heavily focussed on remedial ‘cure’ work, rather than prevention

All of the above maps on to public health issues in a number of ways. We have the obvious concern of poor air quality in the immediate local environments. In addition, there are the effects on public health of new road, rail and air schemes; the public health effects of global climate change; the threats to public health of technological solutions, such as the possible implications on physical activity of ‘mobility as a service’ solutions; and so on.

Fundamentally, there is a challenge in the way that health budgets are used almost exclusively for healthcare intervention. So much more could be achieved if more of these budgets were diverted to prevention work. In this case, health services could realise huge benefits from refocussing investment to prevention work to support cleaner air, e.g. supporting walking and cycling, rather than dealing with people once they have fallen victim to the afflictions of poor air.

What Sustrans is doing to help

At the heart of the concern about air quality is the fact that people are being exposed to air that is dirtier than we deserve. Reducing levels of motor traffic on the roads by improving facilities for walking and cycling is one of the best ways to reduce that exposure. Sustrans has recently released a model that can support local authorities in understanding the extent of the impact of walking and cycling schemes in reducing personal exposure to air pollution. It provides evidence that active travel spend has greater potential as preventative health spend than previously assumed.

Government has a legal responsibility to reduce exposure of its citizens to air pollution and this model helps both national and local government to see the extent to which cycling and walking projects are successful in doing just that.

Although the model will not help to resolve all of the policy issues outlined above, we hope that it will help to support effective policy development, and make a contribution to embedding better planning for walking and cycling in our towns and cities.

Find out more about the Sustrans Eunomia air quality model



from RSSMix.com Mix ID 8239590 https://www.sustrans.org.uk/blog/joining-dots-between-government-policies-and-air-quality
via IFTTT

source https://ukresinboundsurfacing.tumblr.com/post/169578270923

Monday 8 January 2018

Enabling communities to tackle the school run

Glenrothes family cycling to school

Family cycling to school in Glenrothes, Scotland

The journey to and from school is one made by thousands of children across Scotland each day.

And for those travelling actively – be that by bike, scooter or foot – it is a chance to learn more about their local area, share experiences with their friends and family and improve their health and wellbeing.

But whilst the health and wellbeing benefits of travelling actively to school are well known and documented, for many, time, convenience or worries over safety mean that there simply isn’t the option for this to happen. 

The recent publication of the School Travel Survey for Parents, released by Sustrans Scotland and the Scottish Parent Teacher Council, highlighted many of the barriers faced by families when travelling to school by foot or bike.

Safe routes to school

A key finding from the survey showed that the main barrier for parents and carers getting their children to travel more actively to school was fears over their physical safety. 

The survey found that 42.4% of parents felt that unsafe walking and cycling routes, a lack of or inadequate pavements, ineffective or lack of crossings, unsafe school entrances and dangerous driving were all major factors which prevented their children from walking, cycling or scootering to school.

One parent said: “Even if we lived closer I would have to transport my children due to the area surrounding the school (within one mile) is not safe for children to walk or cycle, due to busy roads.”

And whilst grants such as our Safer Routes to School fund are available to local authorities to help create safer paths and links to schools for local communities, it is clear there is much more to be done to enable children and parents to feel safe when walking or cycling to school.

Active travel inequality

Having the choice to get to school by foot or by bike should be an option afforded to all children regardless of where they live, but this isn’t always the case.

Our research showed that the motivation behind the way children travel to school varied depending on if they lived in an area classed as low or high deprivation.

While parents living in areas of low deprivation said their main reasons for their choice were motivated by fitness (40.8%), convenience (39.1%) and wellbeing (34.5%), parents in areas of high deprivation said their main reasons were down to physical safety including traffic (32.7%) and personal safety such as stranger danger (26.5%), as well as convenience (25.2%).

Children living in areas classed as high deprivation don’t have the same opportunities to travel actively to school as their peers, creating unequal opportunities for children to make healthier, more active journeys every day.

Urban vs rural communities

The study found children living in rural areas face additional barriers to travelling actively to school, with parents citing distance as a key issue.

Adequate transport provision was mentioned by parents who felt they lived too far from the school to travel actively. Some parents could not afford to pay for the bus if it wasn’t subsided, and some children had a school journey by car subsided by their local authority, due to distance or a safe route to school being unavailable.

Tackling the school run

Our Safer Routes To School Fund gives Local Authorities and partner organisations the chance to apply for money to help improve unsafe walking and cycling routes.

Partners can apply for up to 50% matched funding to address issues such as a lack of or inadequate pavements, ineffective or lack of crossings and unsafe school entrances - all major factors which our School Travel Survey showed prevented parents from encouraging their children to walk, cycle or scooter to school.

With 22% of primary one children in Scotland at risk of being overweight or obese, with children living in areas of high deprivation almost double as likely than those in less deprived areas to be at risk of being obese (NHS Scotland, 2017), it’s more important than ever to be enabling communities to travel actively for more of their everyday journeys to encourage happier, healthier communities.

If we are to encourage healthy travel habits in children which can last a lifetime, now is the time to tackle the school run in every community.

Find out more about the Safer Routes to School fund in Scotland 



from RSSMix.com Mix ID 8239590 https://www.sustrans.org.uk/blog/enabling-communities-tackle-school-run
via IFTTT

source https://ukresinboundsurfacing.tumblr.com/post/169471529023

Thursday 4 January 2018

Six years on: the case for sustainable transport is overwhelming

Sustrans Board of Trustee's 2014

Bill with the Board of Trustees at annual Board meeting in Swansea 2014

At the close of 2017 Bill Stow, Chair of our Board of Trustees for the past three years and a member for a further three, handed over the baton to his successor Lynne Berry OBE. Here he shares his thoughts on the challenges and rewards of being at the helm of an important charity and why he is optimistic for the future.

Leading the Board of an important charity through a period of significant change and challenge can be a serious business. I’ve been fortunate to have a diverse Board of lively and committed Trustees (all of whom are volunteers) with a wide range of experience. We are united around a strong belief in the importance of sustainable transport and the role of Sustrans in making it easier for everyone to walk and cycle.

My six years have been a roller-coaster of funding feast and famine, especially in England. We’ve had to take some difficult decisions on restructuring and downsizing, as well as providing strategic direction and fulfilling all the other roles of charity Trustees under increasing external scrutiny.

If all that sounds a bit thankless – far from it. It’s also been enormously rewarding and great fun to see what Sustrans does in every part of the UK.

Connecting people and places

When I started on the Board, the Connect 2 programme to extend the National Cycle Network into the heart of communities was just coming to an end. Working with local authorities and other partners, we generated large amounts of funding to supplement generous Big Lottery money for more than 80 projects linking paths and communities, often with dramatic new bridges over previously insuperable obstacles.

Transforming the journey to school

The end of that big capital programme coincided with the beginnings of a boom in our work in schools and workplaces, funded through local authorities, often in very ethnically diverse areas. We measure the results of these programmes, which consistently lead to much greater use of walking, cycling and scooting instead of the car for the school run.

Over the forty years since Sustrans began we have reached well over a million young people in this way. Even with austerity biting, local authorities want to continue these programmes because of the multiple benefits they bring. But we would like to do so much more.

Our impact across the UK

This work, and other projects on community led street design, were a revelation to me. I became a supporter of Sustrans over 20 years ago because I was inspired by the National Cycle Network and the importance of sustainable transport for tackling climate change. It’s been an eye-opener to learn that our impact goes much, much wider!

In my time, the Board has sampled one of the new Quietways in London, seen different aspects of the major Scottish Government walking and cycling programme which Sustrans manages, ridden greenways in Birmingham and Belfast (a particular interest of mine as I am also Vice- Chair of The Wildlife Trusts) and everywhere met our wonderful, creative and enthusiastic staff and volunteers. It’s been a great privilege to be involved with such an amazing organisation.

Reasons for optimism

What of the future? There’s no disguising that these are difficult times as funding continues to grow tighter. We are extremely lucky in our dedicated and generous supporters but we need to see more commitment from government, of the sort we have in Scotland and London, to make a big impact.

But I’m optimistic. The case for more sustainable transport is overwhelming, whether it be carbon saving, tackling obesity and promoting well-being, air quality, making our towns and cities pleasanter places to live and work and thus attracting business. As a flexible, creative and well-managed charity, experienced in partnership working, Sustrans is well placed to offer solutions to all of these problems at local and national levels.

I leave the leadership of Sustrans in good hands. Xavier Brice, our CEO, has brought strong strategic direction and new ideas; and Lynne Berry, my successor as Chair has an amazing range of experience in the charity and public sector, as well as being an ardent champion of the benefits of walking and cycling. I’ve told her that it will be challenging but enormous fun.

Finally, my thanks to all our staff, supporters and volunteers. I know just how much you contribute to our success in a huge variety of ways. We couldn’t achieve what we do without you.

Read about our new Chair, Lynne Berry OBE



from RSSMix.com Mix ID 8239590 https://www.sustrans.org.uk/blog/six-years-case-sustainable-transport-overwhelming
via IFTTT

source https://ukresinboundsurfacing.tumblr.com/post/169314149998

Wednesday 3 January 2018

Better cycling infrastructure has many benefits for Belfast - just ask mum

Kelly Hargie, cycling blogger

Blogger and mum Kelly Hargie enjoys cycling with her three sons in all weathers in Belfast

Family walking together

Kelly Hargie enjoying the outdoors with her three boys

View from handlebars of a cyclist

There’s something about having handle bars in front of me rather than a steering wheel that enables me to tune into my surroundings

As work begins on a new protected cycle lane in the heart of Belfast (Middlepath Street), one mum from the east of the city, Kelly Hargie hails the multiple benefits of cycling and good infrastructure. 

Since moving to Belfast eight years ago I’ve been cycling regularly to get around the city. During that time I’ve experienced the good, bad and ugly aspects of being a cyclist in this city. Last summer while cycling with my family on the Lagan Towpath we overheard a lady say ‘I really hate cyclists’ as we went by.

We were in single-file, me at the front, my husband at the back with the three kids in-between. We were on the left-hand side of the path, cycling at a slow, steady pace. We were communicating with the kids, encouraging them to slow down when necessary, to look out for dogs not on leads, to be considerate towards pedestrians and generally educating them to be courteous. When I looked around I could tell by the looks on my kids’ faces that they’d heard the words.

I stopped to explain to the lady that we weren’t “cyclists”, just ordinary people who just happened to be on bicycles. Simply a family out for a bike-ride on a summer’s day on a shared path. We were astonished at such a bitter attitude. We weren’t speeding, heads down, ignoring other users of the path. It made me realise that there’s a long way to go in changing people’s opinions of people on bicycles and this is something that both people who cycle and non-bicycle-riders need to work on.

Another time, I was shouted at by a man while on the morning school run. He squared up to me, while my youngest was seated on the back of my bicycle. I lost my balance and almost fell onto the road. He was angry because I had rung my bell to alert him to our presence on the footpath and to give him time to move across slightly so that we could pass safely. 

That was an ugly experience and I was shaken for a long while afterwards. I was annoyed at his anger and the way he spoke to me in front of my children. I was a mum trying to get her three kids to school on time and get some exercise at the same time. That’s difficult enough without encountering such aggression. It could easily have deterred me from cycling. Thankfully it didn’t.

Protected cycle lanes would make cycling easier and safer

Would a protected cycle lane have changed this situation? Possibly. The Belfast Bike Life report found the overwhelming majority of people in Belfast support protected cycle lanes. Life would be so much easier if Belfast had a cycle network that allowed people to travel safely. I’ve seen first-hand in the Netherlands how fantastic towns can be when each mode of transport has its own designated space. Cars on roads, pedestrians on footpaths, bicycles in bike-lanes. Yet, it doesn’t divide people, only the modes of transport.

If anything, I witnessed a sense of respect and a city flowing harmoniously. People who drive, also cycle. People who cycle, also walk. So there is an understanding of what it is like to be on a bicycle or on foot trying to get around. People are able to enjoy all modes of transport, because the city is built in such a way that allows them to.

Despite some improvements here, with the Connswater Community Greenway and some city centre cycle lanes, it’s still fairly difficult to move safely around the city on a bicycle, especially with children in tow! Maybe more people would cycle with their kids or commute by bicycle if there was adequate infrastructure which meant the journey would be safe and hassle-free.

Provision of cycle lanes, may also help increase the number of women cycling in Belfast. Currently, only 30% of the people that regularly cycle in Belfast are female, according to Bike Life. Why is that? I would guess that the main thing that stops people getting on their bicycles is the lack of safe cycling space.

I’ve talked with mums at the school and they have told me it would just be too much like hard work to try and get kids to school by bicycle because they would have to negotiate roads, go up and down kerbs and would generally just feel like they are getting in the way. I think this is really sad and my conversations tell me that more people would love to get out cycling with their kids if only it was a little easier!

Health, communities and business benefits from cycling

Imagine the health benefits too if more people were able to regularly cycle. It would alleviate so much pressure on the already stretched NHS as it deals with an obesity crisis and the consequences of inactive, unhealthy lifestyles. Long-term, it could save money if funds were invested now in a safer cycle network.

Communities would also benefit from having a decent cycle network. I’ve met lots of new people and have fallen in love with my local area through getting out and about on my bicycle. The social aspect of individuals and families out on bicycles is certainly an attraction and active families in turn means active communities which are overall healthier and happier.

In the past eight years I have come to love my daily cycles, even if it’s just nipping to the shop for some milk or doing the school run. I’m noticing recently more city-style bikes, like those you would see in Amsterdam or Copenhagen, with baskets on the front packed with groceries. That indicates that people want to cycle in this city, not just for sport or exercise, but in their daily routine. And why wouldn’t they?

Belfast has so much to see and do, so much to enjoy. The tourism industry and the local economy would reap financial reward if people were encouraged to experience the city by bicycle. The recent Ciclovia event in Belfast showed how people visiting the city on bike could support local traders, with coffee shops and cafes jam-packed during the event.

By choosing to experience my city by bicycle, I avoid queues of traffic which keeps down stress levels and there’s something about having handle bars in front of me rather than a steering wheel that enables me to tune into my surroundings, to appreciate my environment and to engage with the people I share this city with.

Kelly is mum to three boys and her blog Everytreasure has been shortlisted in the UK Blog Awards.

Find out more about the Bike Life report in Belfast



from RSSMix.com Mix ID 8239590 https://www.sustrans.org.uk/blog/better-cycling-infrastructure-has-many-benefits-belfast-just-ask-mum
via IFTTT

source https://ukresinboundsurfacing.tumblr.com/post/169274354538

Resin Bound Surfacing

We supply interior resin surfacing for a variety of facilities, and also homes. The most common resin floors for indoors is self-levelling ...